|
Deakin,
Alfred
(1856 - 1919)
ALFRED
(1856-1919), barrister, journalist and prime
minister, was born on 3 August 1856 at Collingwood,
Melbourne, younger child of William Deakin
of Towcester, Northamptonshire, England,
and his wife Sarah, née Bill, of Llanarth,
Cardiganshire, Wales. William and Sarah
left England in December 1849 in the Samuel
Boddington, bound for Sydney. In March
1850 they disembarked at Adelaide, where
William's married sister lived and where
their first child, Catherine Sarah, was
born in July.
William briefly pursued his former occupations
of clerk and shopman before, late in 1851,
joining the exodus of men to the goldfields
of Victoria. The family soon followed; by
1853 William had abandoned the fields and
the Deakins settled in Collingwood (later
a part of Fitzroy), where they lived as
respectable suburbanites of modest means.
William
undertook a variety of jobs, storekeeping,
water-carting and carrying, before becoming
a partner in a coaching business and later
manager of Cobb & Co. in Victoria.
Alfred
Deakin began
his formal education aged 4 at a boarding
school situated first at Kyneton and later
at South Yarra. In 1864 he became a day-boy
at the nearby Melbourne Church of England
Grammar School. Already Deakin
read avidly and day-dreamed habitually,
practices which hampered his academic studies.
He did not excel at games. Later he looked
back upon his schooldays as a time of wasted
opportunities. Nonetheless, he won a few
subject prizes and survived happily enough
to the upper school where he came under
the influence of a young master, J. H. Thompson,
and the school's renowned headmaster, Dr
J. E. Bromby, whose style of oratory, which
Deakin's own
later closely resembled, fascinated him.
At last he was inspired to work seriously.
He
matriculated in 1871, 'passing' in English
and Latin, and 'passing well' in history,
algebra and Euclid.
Deakin
strayed into the study of law at the University
of Melbourne. By evening he attended lectures,
by day he earned pocket-money as a schoolteacher
and private tutor. He spoke frequently at
the University Debating Club, where he met
C. H. Pearson. He gained further skill and
experience in the Eclectic Association of
Victoria, where members aired current notions
on a range of intellectual topics. He was
prominent in the spiritualist movement,
attending seances, testing phenomena, arranging
lectures and conducting the Progressive
Lyceum, the spiritualist Sunday school.
In 1874 he edited and contributed to the
Lyceum Leader and a year later his
small volume Quentin Massys: A Drama
in Five Acts appeared. In 1877 he published
A New Pilgrim's Progress, a lengthy
allegory imbued with the loftiest moral
principles, and he became president of the
Victorian Association of Spiritualists.
He passed in 1877 the final examination
for the certificate in law then required
for admission to the Victorian Bar. He took
chambers in Temple Court, where with little
enthusiasm for law and no great expectations
he wrote poetry, essays and literary criticism.
An
introduction in May 1878 to David Syme of
the Melbourne Age rescued the restless
Deakin from
his near-briefless career. Syme, who became
a close friend, engaged him as a paid contributor
of reviews, leaders, sub-leaders and general
articles on politics, literature and miscellaneous
topics. In 1880 he edited the Leader,
the Age's weekly. He excelled at
journalism, which became his major occupation
for some five years and provided a useful
source of income for most of his life. Syme
also converted him from free trade beliefs
to protectionist, a change which helped
both his journalistic and political ambitions.
Deakin's interest
in Victorian politics had been aroused by
the resignation of the liberal parliamentarian,
George Higinbotham one of his boyhood heroes,
the entry into parliament of Pearson, and
the constitutional conflict which Deakin
described in the memoir (1900) published
in 1957 as The Crisis in Victorian Politics,
1879-1881. With Syme's aid he became
the Liberal candidate for West Bourke, a
largely rural electorate, which he won narrowly
in February 1879.
The
young Deakin
who entered parliament was an impressive
figure. He was six feet (about 183 cm) tall,
dark haired and dark eyed, his handsome,
alert face fashionably bearded. He spoke
rapidly in a rich, baritone voice which,
he claimed, bore no trace of 'provincial'
accent. In his maiden speech he startled
members by announcing his resignation because
of doubts about the fairness of the administration
of the original poll. He lost the recontested
by-election in August and lost again in
the general election of February 1880, which
also saw the defeat of (Sir)
Graham Berry's government. In July he
headed the poll in West Bourke after James
Service, 'Conservative' leader, had
secured a dissolution of parliament. Despite
his youth and inexperience, and in the face
of opposition from his own party and the
Age, he was prominent in negotiating
a compromise between moderates on both sides
and helped to secure the Council Reform
Act of 1881.
On
3 April 1882 Deakin
married 19-year-old Elizabeth Martha Anne
('Pattie'), daughter of wealthy Hugh
Junor Browne, a prominent spiritualist.
The marriage, disapproved of by the Brownes,
brought no material benefit to the Deakins.
They lived for a time with Deakin's
parents: in 1887 Llanarth, their house in
Walsh Street, South Yarra, was completed.
For the rest of his active life, Deakin
walked, bicycled or took the tram into the
city.
From
March 1883 to November 1890 Deakin
held office in coalition governments. He
proved an able administrator, and he practised
and polished the art of compromise. He introduced
the Factories and Shops Act of 1885, a pioneer
social measure based largely on British
legislation that had impressed the royal
commission of 1884. The Act, though mutilated
by the Legislative Council, provided for
the regulation and inspection of factories,
enforced sanitary regulations, limited the
hours of work of females and youths, and
compensated workers for injury. He chaired
the 1884 royal commission on irrigation,
a cause he pressed with fervour. Late in
the year he led a small party to California
to investigate irrigation and conservation
schemes. There he met the Chaffey
brothers and reported enthusiastically
on their experiments. The Chaffeys came
to Victoria in 1886 and demonstrated their
methods at Mildura. In June Deakin
introduced the first legislation in Australia
to promote an irrigation system. The bill
broke with traditional English riparian
law by placing ownership of natural waters
under the Crown and provided for the construction
of state-aided irrigation works by local
trusts. Promise of early success faded because
of technical problems, poor choice of associates
by the Chaffeys, the depression of the 1890s
and one of the worst droughts in Australian
history. But in the long run successful
irrigation and water schemes became a feature
of rural Victoria and Australia.
Late
in 1885 Berry and Service retired and were
succeeded, as leaders of the coalition,
by Deakin and
Duncan
Gillies. Deakin,
chief secretary, also took the portfolio
of water-supply to which was added, in 1890,
health and, briefly, solicitor-general.
He was Victoria's principal representative
at the Colonial Conference of 1887. In London
he met and impressed many prominent public
figures, politicians, writers and intellectuals
and formed lasting friendships. At the conference
he played the role of native-born Victorian
patriot pressing 'colonial' interests. He
argued forcibly for better terms in the
naval agreement, under which the colonies
paid an annual subsidy towards the cost
of an auxiliary squadron for use in Australian
waters. With Sir
Samuel Griffith, Service and Berry he
confronted Lord
Salisbury, prime minister and foreign
secretary, over the issue of the New Hebrides.
British officials recognized in him the
authentic, but not always welcome, voice
of colonial nationalism. He returned home
to a triumphant welcome.
Melbourne
at this time was indeed marvellous and a
massive inflow of British capital fuelled
the Victorian boom. The coalition won the
election of March 1889, but problems over
proposed railway construction and use of
the militia to protect non-union labour
in the maritime strike—an action for which
Deakin bore
ministerial responsibility—caused the government's
defeat in October 1890. By then the land
boom was starting to waver and soon the
bubble burst. Deakin,
like many contemporaries of his social class,
speculated heavily in the rush to be rich:
he lost his own and his father's savings.
Unlike many he repaid his debts. Nonetheless,
the picture of him as an innocent intellectual
unwittingly caught up in the brutal world
of business seems too kind. He was chairman
or director of many dubious companies, including
those of the notorious boomer James
Munro; Deakin's
friend Theodore
Fink possibly sometimes persuaded him
to lend his name. As joint coalition leader
he shared power and responsibility in a
government whose own borrowing and investment
policies contributed much to the onset of
the collapse and the severity of the depression.
As an individual investor he sought quick
and easy profit with the rest of them.
Outwardly,
after the coalition's defeat and financial
disaster, Deakin
seemed his familiar confident self. Inwardly,
as copious note-books and diaries reveal,
he was disillusioned. Tortured by self-doubt,
he longed to restore his self-respect. He
spent the next ten years as an influential
back-bencher, the member from 1889 for Essendon
and Flemington. Syme urged him to replace
Munro as premier, (Sir)
George Turner consulted him about the
composition of his government in 1894, but
he refused all offers of ministerial posts.
He returned to the practice of law. He was
engaged in several major cases, the most
celebrated being as defender without fee
in 1892 of the mass murderer F.
B. Deeming, and as junior to J.
L. Purves in 1893-94 in the lengthy
defence of Syme in a libel case. A respectable
income at the Bar supplemented his parliamentary
salary and helped to support a growing family,
which in 1891 had seen the addition of his
third and last daughter. In 1893 he published
Irrigated India and Temple and
Tomb in India, following a short working
visit to India and Ceylon (Sri Lanka) financed
by Syme. He read everything that came his
way in English literature, biography, history
and philosophy, French in the original,
and German and the classics in translation.
He was active in the Theosophical Society
until 1896, when he resigned on joining
the Australian Church, led by Charles
Strong. He retained a wide interest
in public affairs through the Protectionist
Association, the National Anti-Sweating
League, the Australian Natives' Association,
the Imperial Federation League (of which
he became president in 1905) and the Federal
Council of Australasia. But his main preoccupation
in the 1890s was the Federation movement.
Deakin's
interest in Federation had been stimulated
by Service and heightened by experience
at the Colonial Conference of 1887, where
colonial division thwarted attempts to overcome
Imperial apathy. He attended all the official
Federal conferences and conventions. He
appears to have helped resolve differences
between Gillies and Sir
Henry Parkes, who convened the Australasian
Federation Conference of 1890. Deakin
was the youngest delegate to the National
Australasian Convention of 1891 in Sydney,
and he polled third in the popular election
of ten Victorian delegates to the Australasian
Federal Convention of 1897-98: in both he
served on the constitutional committee.
As a progressive liberal from a large colony
he adopted a democratic stance on most issues.
He opposed conservative plans for the indirect
election of senators and sought a relatively
weak 'States House' which he foresaw would
be dominated by political parties. On the
most vital constitutional issue of all,
control of money bills, he tried to limit
the Senate's power and make the House of
Representatives supreme. He advocated wide
taxation powers for the Commonwealth.
Backstage
Deakin was
the familiar eloquent proposer of compromises,
the able conciliator, the tactful smoother
of ruffled feathers. Even so, his reputation
as an Australian nationalist seeking to
overcome colonial parochialism, as a staunch
Federationist urging delegates that whenever
they detected a Federal interest they should
'provide for it in advance', is not without
minor blemish. At the first convention he
claimed that special safeguards might need
to be made for Victoria's protected factories.
He reluctantly approved C.
C. Kingston's proposed new Federal arbitration
power, and his remarks that it could not
possibly become a 'proper subject' for Federal
legislation for a very long time and might
be exercised 'less satisfactorily' than
by individual colonies, did little to advance
the idea.
While
Deakin played
a significant part in making and shaping
the Constitution, his contribution to the
'popular' phases of the Federation movement
was probably greater. The Constitution bill
of 1891 was unpopular, and politicians and
public alike lacked enthusiasm. Sir
John Robertson's boast that Federation
was as 'dead as Julius Caesar' seemed valid
and few but dedicated nationalists mourned
its passing. In Victoria, Deakin
set out to resurrect the corpse. In March
1893, at the annual conference of the A.N.A.,
he and Purves urged the association to broaden
its appeals and campaigns. Deakin
suggested combining with other Federal sympathizers,
and (Sir)
Edmund Barton was asked to create a
central Federation league in Sydney. Later,
Deakin prompted
the Prahran branch to propose a Federation
league, of which he became foundation executive
chairman in 1894.
These
efforts, and similar ones of Barton and
others in New South Wales, took Federation
out of the hands of parliamentarians, and
helped to ensure its success. As chairman
of the Federation League of Victoria and
acknowledged leader and symbol of the cause
in the colony, Deakin
was the central figure in the referenda
campaigns of 1898-99, when the Commonwealth
bill was put to the popular test. His celebrated
address at the A.N.A. banquet at Bendigo
in March 1898 set the tone for the campaign
and converted a hostile, but still suspicious,
Age. A dithering Turner declared
for the bill. In 1899 Deakin
campaigned in Queensland, which had stood
aside until it was clear that Federal union
of at least four colonies was about to occur.
London
staged the final act of the Federation movement.
In January 1900 Joseph Chamberlain invited
the colonies to send delegates for the passing
of the Constitution bill through the Imperial
parliament. Allan
McLean, Victorian premier, appointed
Deakin, who
later in the month sailed for London with
his wife, sister and daughters. Barton,
Kingston, Sir
Philip Fysh of Tasmania and (Sir)
James Dickson of Queensland made up
the team selected to defend the Constitution
to the last comma. In the end differences
came down to clause 74, which forbade appeals
to the Privy Council in matters affecting
the interpretation of the Constitution.
At first Chamberlain deleted the whole clause.
In this he was fortified by the defection
of Dickson, the wavering of some colonial
premiers—to whom he had appealed—and the
devious conduct of several chief justices,
notably Griffith and Sir
Samuel Way. Deakin,
Barton and Kingston put their case to the
British public, at numerous complimentary
functions. In the event they compromised:
appeals involving constitutional issues
required leave of the High Court, otherwise
the right of appeal remained unimpaired
unless further limited by the parliament
of the Commonwealth. The triumphant trio
danced 'hand in hand' in jubilation. In
July, as he sailed home to a great welcome,
an 'Act to constitute the Commonwealth of
Australia' received the royal assent.
Deakin
made a remarkable decision on his return.
In London he had met Lord Glenesk, proprietor,
and Nicol Dunn, editor, of the Morning
Post. In November he accepted an offer
to become their 'special' or 'Sydney' correspondent,
furnishing weekly letters and occasional
cables on Australian politics for £500 a
year. In his just-completed manuscript (first
published in 1944 as The Federal Story),
he recorded an 'inner history' of the Federation
movement. An anonymous Deakin
was now to write an inner account of Federal
politics for a Tory unionist paper even
as he was about to become a minister of
the Crown, and remain one for most of the
thirteen years of his secret journalism.
The money was useful and he persuaded himself
that it was his duty to supply an ignorant
British public with informed news and views
on Australian politics. Later, in 1904-05,
he was to write unsigned articles for the
London National Review. The letters
and articles were to prove vivid in style,
intelligent in comment, relatively free
from bias and mildly critical of himself
on occasions. By any standards it was extraordinary.
The
turn of the century was a momentous time
in the history of Australia and the Empire.
Queen Victoria died and the South African
War was being fought. Australians looked
to the coming of the Commonwealth, and aspiring
Federal politicians looked forward to the
general election in March 1901. Deakin
formed the National Liberal Organization,
which united wings of the Liberal Party
in Victoria, and as founder-president he
espoused progressive liberal policies and
selected candidates. He exchanged letters
with Barton and Kingston, discussing platforms
and tactics. The Earl
of Hopetoun, governor-general, blundered
in asking Sir
William Lyne, premier of New South Wales
but an anti-Federationist in the referenda,
to form a caretaker cabinet. Deakin's
refusal to serve under Lyne proved decisive,
and Hopetoun called upon Barton.
Deakin
helped to select the 'shadow cabinet' and
advised on the number and nature of departments
and the distribution of portfolios. He himself
was sworn in as attorney-general: the youngest
member of cabinet. With fellow members he
devised the Protectionist policy speech,
delivered by Barton at Maitland on 17 January
1901.
The
first Federal election resulted in a narrow
majority for the Protectionists over Free
Traders. Labor came in third and declared
its tactics of support-in-return-for-concessions,
which in practice meant giving general support
to the Barton government. Free Traders outnumbered
Protectionists in the Senate, and Labor
surprised even itself by winning the balance
of nearly a quarter of the seats. Deakin
won handsomely in Ballarat, which he held
until he retired in 1913.
Federal
parliament opened in May and the Barton
ministry in general, and Deakin
in particular, faced daunting tasks. As
leader of the House Deakin
was frequently in charge of parliamentary
business, and as attorney-general he headed
a department which drafted bills for foundation
machinery and policies, and provided advice
and opinions on points of law for other
ministers. While (Sir)
R. R. Garran, his energetic departmental
secretary, was indispensable, Deakin
was an active attorney-general, especially
in preparing opinions and drafting bills
for the public service, arbitration and
the High Court. On the immigration restriction
bill he supported Barton against Labor,
who wanted more direct methods of exclusion
than the dictation test. His famous second
reading speech on the bill lacked the vicious
racism of many others, but his claim that
Japanese must be kept out because of their
good qualities, not their bad, neither pleased
nor placated them. He took no part in interminable
debates on the tariff, but his diplomacy
in September 1902 averted possible deadlock
between the Senate and House, and secured
the measure which set the Commonwealth on
the path to financial independence. By this
time he was acting prime minister, a post
he filled for six months while Barton attended
the coronation and the Colonial Conference.
White
Australia legislation was never in real
danger and a uniform tariff had to be passed,
but the Judiciary Act of 1903 needed all
Deakin's negotiating
skills. The Constitution provided for a
High Court, but it set down no mandatory
timetable for its creation and the bill
met unexpected hostility. Inside Federal
parliament (Sir)
George Reid, Opposition leader, played
politics, blaming the government both for
undue haste and improper delay: many Protectionists
were uneasy. Outside, State politicians,
newspapers and the public condemned the
proposal on State-rights grounds and with
telling charges of Federal extravagance.
Deakin's masterful
second reading speech in March 1902 was
widely regarded as a supreme example of
parliamentary advocacy. In the end, passage
of the bill probably owed less to the speech
than to personal loyalty to 'affable Alfred'
and hints of his possible resignation. While
the bill to found the High Court was Deakin's
most 'cherished' measure, according to the
anonymous correspondent, the conciliation
and arbitration bill was Kingston's. Kingston,
pioneer of compulsory arbitration, became
its first Federal casualty when, in July
1903, he resigned over cabinet's refusal
to extend the bill's scope to all seamen
engaged in coastal trade. Deakin
took charge of the measure. Most members
agreed with the principle of arbitration,
but disagreement arose on detail. Labor's
Andrew
Fisher, assisted by the Opposition,
amended the bill to include State railway-workers.
Deakin abandoned
the bill for the time being.
When
Barton retired to the High Court in September
Deakin succeeded
him as prime minister and minister of external
affairs. He made several ministerial changes,
bringing in Thomas
Playford and (Sir) Austin Chapman. Deakin
retained office in the December election,
which produced three almost equal parties
in the House, with informal Labor support.
His government was short lived. He reintroduced
the arbitration bill in March 1904, but
Labor amended the bill to apply it to State
public servants, a move he believed unconstitutional.
He treated the defeat as a matter of no
confidence and advised Lord
Northcote, governor-general, to send
for J.
C. Watson, Labor leader. Watson had
less chance of keeping office than Deakin,
who promised him 'fair play' provided he
acquired a 'constitutional' majority. Labor,
however, took office in April without making
overtures to radical Protectionists such
as Lyne and (Sir)
Isaac Isaacs.
In
May Deakin
urged his party to accept Reid's terms for
a working alliance though he himself would
not serve in any coalition with Reid, whom
he disliked and mistrusted. A divided Protectionist
Party refused the offer and Watson's belated
overtures. Labor pressed on with the arbitration
bill until halted by (Sir)
J. W. McCay who, with Deakin's
concurrence, later moved against its recommittal.
Watson resigned in August after two days
of bitter debate. Deakin's
role in the affair marred his reputation
and he lost much goodwill in parliament.
Nevertheless, his own unexpected resignation,
which forced Labor to accept responsibility
for its actions, was a shrewd tactic. Labor's
short, barren period of government curbed
its irresponsible conduct and made it wary
of taking office.
Deakin
declined to join the Reid-McLean coalition
of conservative Free Traders and Protectionists,
but an opportunity for a return to office
arose during the long parliamentary recess.
The campaigns in New South Wales of anti-socialist
leagues, which seemed much like old free
trade bodies under new guise, and ideas
of forming similar ones in Victoria, made
Protectionists suspicious of Reid's motives.
Multifarious pressure mounted to depose
Reid before he called a premature election
designed, the argument ran, to advantage
Free Traders by prolonging the fiscal truce.
Deakin warned
that the anticipated reports of the tariff
commission, appointed in December 1904,
would inevitably disturb the truce. His
speech at Ballarat in June just before parliament
reassembled was regarded as a 'Notice to
Quit'. Northcote's speech mentioned only
one bill, and Deakin
carried an amendment to the address-in-reply.
Northcote refused a dissolution and called
upon Deakin,
who had Watson's assurance of 'cordial and
generous support' for the remainder of the
parliament. Reid's charges of treachery
were to be expected, but Deakin's
seemingly shabby treatment of the four Protectionists
in the coalition, especially of Turner,
lost him further goodwill and respect.
The
second Deakin
ministry, July 1905–November 1908, was remarkably
productive. Many national policies and much
practical legislation were placed on the
statute books or would soon become law after
the government's fall. Measures fixed the
capital site, authorized the survey of a
trans-continental railway-route, and provided
for Australian statistics, meteorology,
wireless telegraphy and copyright. The Contract
Immigrants Act of 1905 established stringent
procedures and safeguards for admitting
contract labour, and the Commonwealth assumed
full control of the former British New Guinea.
The first protective Federal tariff was
passed. 'New Protection' tried in devious
ways to link the Commonwealth's exclusive
control of the tariff with the State's power
over wages and prices. The Commonwealth
Literary Fund came into being and Australia
involved itself in Antarctica. The Surplus
Revenue Act of 1908 set the Commonwealth
on the path to financial independence and
dominance. Naval and military defence innovations
were under way. Old-age pensions were introduced.
Most
of these measures were the responsibility
of Deakin's
ministerial colleagues such as Lyne,
Isaacs,
Sir
John Forrest, (Sir)
Littleton Groom and Sir
Thomas Ewing, and they were not his
in any personal sense. But Deakin
selected his colleagues and he led and kept
in office a cabinet wherein he was manifestly
not merely first among equals. Many were
consensus policies favoured by members of
all parties. Old-age pensions, for example,
was a common cause. New Protection was neither
a subtle scheme devised by Deakin
to convert Labor to protection nor a Labor
concession forced from Deakin,
but an evolutionary policy sought by Free
Traders, Protectionists and Laborites alike:
none were more determined than Free Traders
that if there was to be a system of protection
it must take the new form. Conservative
opponents of Deakin
and some Labor politicians claimed that
he was under Labor's thumb, the one to deny
him credit, the other to claim it for themselves.
Labor, however, was in a weak tactical position.
Watson could not bargain or negotiate with
Reid, now anti-socialist leader, and play
him off against Deakin,
and Labor's own brief spell of office in
1904 showed it was unlikely to govern effectively
on its own.
Labor
support for Deakin
was vital, but it is doubtful if he conceded
much in return. Though the platforms of
the two parties had much in common, some
policies were peculiarly Labor. None of
them were implemented by Deakin,
or Barton. The Immigration Restriction Act
retained its indirect method of exclusion,
and Deakin
refused preference to unionists in his arbitration
bill; there was no referendum on the tariff
as favoured by Labor, no land tax or nationalization
of monopolies. If anyone held the balance
in parliament it was Deakin,
between Labor and 'socialism' on the left
and free trade or anti-socialism on the
right. His negotiating skills, personal
qualities and good relations with Watson
enabled the Protectionist Party to retain
office even after it emerged from the election
of 1906 as the smallest of the three elevens.
He provided stability of government enabling
the passing of constructive legislation,
and at the time only he seemed able to do
that.
Deakin,
by inclination and by virtue of his position
as prime minister and minister of external
affairs, was closely concerned with the
related fields of 'foreign' policy, Imperial
relations and defence. He took direct interest
in Papua, where a faction-ridden administration
limped on. In August 1906 he appointed a
royal commission, which recommended the
removal of the administrator, Captain F.
R. Barton, and the sacking of some principal
officers. In November 1908 he named (Sir)
Hubert Murray, then chief judicial officer
and acting administrator, as lieutenant-governor,
an appointment Labor confirmed, and the
thirty-year reign of the benevolent paternalist
began. Deakin
resumed old battles with the Imperial government
over the future of the New Hebrides, urging
that France be induced to accept British
annexation. Apparent British ineptitude
and the secretive nature of Anglo-French
negotiations confirmed his low opinion of
the Colonial Office. In the end, fearful
of German activity in the islands, he perforce
pressed for the immediate proclamation of
the joint protectorate.
In
March 1907 Deakin
left for the Imperial Conference in London
with three main aims: to reform Imperial
organization, to advance the cause of Imperial
preference and to revise the naval agreement.
He was the most active and outspoken colonial
premier on the theme that the Empire must
draw closer together lest it fall apart.
His proposal for a permanent Imperial secretariat
to give self-governing dominions an effective
voice in foreign policy, defence and economic
co-operation, received a cold reception.
The Colonial Office saw it as an attempt
to undermine its authority, doubts about
ministerial control arose and the idea lacked
definition and practicality. Lord Elgin's
creation of a dominions division of the
Colonial Office was not much more than a
change of name.
Deakin's
pleas for Imperial preference as a means
of strengthening the Empire politically
and economically met with little support
from colonial premiers and outright opposition
from the British government. Sir Wilfred
Laurier, Canada, was prepared to accept
it if it was offered, Louis Botha, South
Africa, spoke negatively. Neither, for domestic
reasons, wanted further Imperial entanglements.
Deakin's public
campaign on the question touched sensitive
issues in British politics. To conservative
newspapers and Tories he was a hero, to
their liberal counterparts a villain. Asquith
and Lloyd George remained implacably opposed.
The Admiralty was more sympathetic to the
notion of an Australian naval force, but
differences on the naval agreement were
not resolved.
Deakin
had disliked the naval agreement since its
inception in 1902, and his sustained efforts
to implement Australian naval aspirations
began several years before the Imperial
Conference. He had also long believed in
the virtues of universal military service;
by December 1907, when he introduced the
first bill to embrace such a scheme, Labor
was about to adopt the idea and parliamentarians
and the public at large had already been
converted. Naval affairs, a more complex
issue, inevitably involved the British government,
the Admiralty, naval tactics and grand strategy,
and from mid-1905 to early 1910 the subject
absorbed him. He attacked the agreement
and the Admiralty, and the rebuffs and insensitive
denials of Australian naval ambitions merely
spurred him on. Late in 1906 he announced
an intended purchase of destroyers, but
at the Imperial Conference the first lord,
Tweedmouth, recommended submarines.
In
1908 Deakin
placed further pressure on the Colonial
Office and the Admiralty with his timely
invitation to the American 'Great White
Fleet' to visit Australian ports. By the
time he resigned in November no vessels
had been ordered but the Surplus Revenue
Act of 1908 provided £250,000 for naval
expenditure, a sum Labor used later. Eventually,
after the naval scare of 1909, when Deakin
played the opportunist by joining the cry
for the gift of a dreadnought to Britain,
the Admiralty suggested a powerful Australian
fleet unit. For Deakin,
the type of vessels and strategic questions
such as those arising from the Russo-Japanese
War of 1904-05 were secondary issues. The
Commonwealth's defence power provided him
with a means to two related ends, one external
the other internal. An Australia prepared
to share Britain's defence burden by being
more self-reliant, particularly in naval
defence, would earn a voice in Imperial
policy. Service for the Commonwealth, especially
military training for youths, would instil
the 'maximum of good citizenship' and foster
a 'sense of national unity' and a 'national
spirit'. For Deakin
acquisition of a navy and introduction of
compulsory military service were essential
steps in the evolution from colony to nation
within the British Empire.
On
returning from the Imperial Conference Deakin
faced acute health and political problems.
He travelled badly, slept fitfully and had
frequent attacks of giddiness and exhaustion.
His memory and speech faltered and he suffered
a breakdown. Forrest, an old colleague,
resigned in July 1907 over the Liberal-Labor
relationship, which became more difficult
after Watson resigned the leadership in
October. Labor withdrew its support in November
1908 and the earl
of Dudley, governor-general, sent for
Fisher. Deakin
came under pressure to form a united front
against Labor, whose militant 'machine'
and electoral activities he feared increasingly.
As Labor ranks had swelled at successive
elections so Liberal-Protectionist numbers
dwindled until the party was the smallest
in the House, and its future looked bleak.
Labor radicalism had outflanked and outpaced
Deakinite liberalism. Neither (Sir)
Joseph Cook, who had succeeded Reid,
nor Forrest would serve under one another.
Deakin, waiting
in the wings, convinced himself that he
could liberalize the conservatives and preserve
radical liberalism. In May 1909 he agreed
to the fusion of anti-socialists, Liberal-Protectionists
and Forrest's 'corner' group. A bewildered
Fisher was curtly dismissed. Close friends
still believed in Deakin's
integrity, but to many others his actions
seemed nothing but a naked grab for power,
a base move to regain office at any price
by a man who thought he was indispensable.
The political confusion produced some of
the most dramatic scenes in Federal parliamentary
history. Lyne — never a friend of Deakin
and now a foe — denounced his former leader
as a 'Judas', a charge which the vindictive
W.
M. Hughes believed slandered the disciple.
Deakin
was sworn in for the third and last time
as prime minister on 2 June 1909. The Fusion
government, given its short span of life
and the few points of agreement between
the uniting parties, was remarkably active.
Deakin ordered
the Australia, the nation's own dreadnought
battle cruiser and pride of the fleet unit.
He invited the legendary Lord Kitchener
to visit Australia to advise on military
defence: later Labor largely implemented
suggested changes in organization and creation
of a military staff college. Bills were
introduced to transfer the Northern Territory
to the Commonwealth and to set up the Inter-State
Commission, and one was passed to establish
the high commission in London. Negotiations
between Deakin,
Forrest and State premiers produced the
financial agreement of 1909, which gave
the States per capita grants of 25s.
annually: Deakin's
attempted constitutional amendment failed
in 1910, but in practice the agreement determined
Commonwealth-State financial arrangements
until 1927.
The
Fusion government entered the election of
April 1910 confident of victory, but in
the event it was routed. In a heavy poll
Labor gained absolute majorities in both
the House and Senate. Deakin,
who campaigned on a mainly negative anti-Labor
platform, barely escaped defeat in Ballarat.
Only a handful of his personal followers
survived. He was ill-suited to the negative
role of Opposition leader, especially as
Labor was advancing many of his own, unfinished
measures. His extensive campaign in 1911
against Labor proposals to amend the Constitution
carried more conviction, but he retired
in January 1913, a spent force. His last
act as a politician was to support Cook
against Forrest in the leadership contest.
In
May 1913 Deakin
emerged from retirement at Ballara, his
hideaway at Point Lonsdale, to campaign
against Labor's re-submitted referenda proposals.
Later he declined Cook's offer of the first
chairmanship of the Inter-State Commission.
In August 1914 he became chairman of the
royal commission to investigate wartime
food supplies and prices and his colleagues
carried him. As president of an Australian
commission for the international exhibition
at San Francisco he toured California in
April 1915 with Pattie, but resigned after
a renewed dispute with Hugh
Mahon, Labor minister of external affairs.
His health deteriorated and he visited specialists
in London and New York in 1916-17. In retirement
and in decline his increasingly introspective
notebooks reflected his despairing sense
of the emptiness of existence, the loneliness
of a man spiritually and intellectually
isolated for most of his life. Like many
affable people he had few intimate friends,
and apparently none knew the inner Deakin.
After 1916 he lived as a recluse, his memory
decayed, the famed silver tongue stilled.
He died of meningo-encephalitis on 7 October
1919, survived by his wife and daughters.
As befitted this independent Australian
Briton he was given a state funeral, his
coffin draped with the Union Jack. He was
buried in St Kilda cemetery.
His
wife Pattie, who died on 30 December 1934,
was well known for her work for children's
welfare, particularly the kindergarten,
crèche and playgrounds movements, and for
servicemen during World War I. Ivy, the
eldest daughter, married Herbert
Brookes, Stella married (Sir)
David Rivett and Vera (Sir) Thomas Walter
White. Deakin's
sister Kate (or Katie) died unmarried in
1937; a talented pianist, she shared and
encouraged her brother's interest in literature
and remained his lifelong mentor and confidante.
Alfred
Deakin, dominant
figure of the first decade of Federation,
was a complex character, the outer man the
generally charming, confident, intelligent
politician, the inner man the often morose,
insecure, frustrated intellectual. The young
man attracted to spiritualism and theosophy
wanted to be a philosopher, poet, dramatist:
instead he merely became a statesman. He
was a gifted politician in an era that lent
itself to his natural talents of compromise
and persuasion. He had integrity, though
he could play the opportunist when the need
arose and the Fusion sullied his reputation
for some. He was unusually modest and circumspect,
declining all British offers of titles and
distinctions in the belief that he had not
earned them and that his independence might
be compromised. In the late nineteenth century
and early twentieth century he epitomized
Victorian liberalism. His services to the
Federation movement and the new nation were
immense. The Commonwealth briefly gained
recognition as a national laboratory for
social experimentation and positive liberalism,
and Deakin
more than anyone brought that about. He
was the embodiment of dual nationalism:
pride in Australia went hand in hand with
pride in Empire, membership of the A.N.A.
with membership of the Imperial Federation
League. He had a mystical faith in the virtues
of the British race and his vision was of
a great white Australia living at one with
and within a greater white Empire. The tragedy
was that he became an anachronism. Liberalism
blossomed and withered in his own time,
and the middle ground disappeared beneath
his feet. The sun was already setting on
the Empire he envisaged.
Select Bibliography
Official
Record of the Proceedings and Debates of
the National Australasian Convention Held
in the Parliament House, Sydney, New South
Wales, in the Months of March and April,
1891 (Syd, 1891); Official Report
of the National Australasian Convention
Debates, Adelaide, March 22 to May 5, 1897
(Adel, 1897); Official Record of the
Debates of the Australasian Federal Convention,
Third Session, Melbourne, 20th January to
17th March, 1898 (Melb, 1898); H. G.
Turner, The First Decade of the Australian
Commonwealth (Melb, 1911); W. Murdoch,
Alfred Deakin
(Lond, 1923); A. Deakin,
The Federal Story, J. A. La Nauze
ed (Melb, 1963); J. A. La Nauze, Alfred
Deakin
(Melb, 1965); A. Deakin,
Federated Australia, J. A. La Nauze
ed (Melb, 1968); G. Serle, The Rush to
be Rich (Melb, 1971); J. A. La Nauze,
The Making of the Australian Constitution
(Melb, 1972); R. Norris, The Emergent
Commonwealth (Melb, 1975); P. Loveday,
et al (eds), The Emergence of the Australian
Party System (Syd, 1977); Historical
Studies, no 55, Oct 1970, p 376; L.
D. Atkinson, Australian Defence Policy:
A Study of Empire and Nation (Ph.D. thesis,
Australian National University, 1964); Edmund
Barton papers (National Library of Australia);
Alfred Deakin
papers (National Library of Australia).
Author:
R. Norris
Print
Publication Details: R. Norris,
'Deakin, Alfred
(1856 - 1919)', Australian Dictionary
of Biography, Volume 8, Melbourne
University Press, 1981, pp 248-256.
|