The Web Link-Zone
Welcome to the Link-Zone website Image Courtesy of Renjith Krishnan
2010 ARTICLES
-
Feb
Mar
LINKS
Australian Christian Lobby
Saltshakers
Family Voice Australia
Australian Prayer Network
Parliamentary Prayer Network, Canberra
Australian Family Association
Sexual Integrity Forum
Make A Stand
The Australian Family Asssociation
Electing Pro-Life Mps in Victoria Election 2010
Protecting religious freedom in Victoria
Debate Magazine
Viewpoint Magazine
Australia Votes
QLD Parliament LIVE
QLD Parliament Sitting Dates
QLD E-Petitions
WEBSITES FOR VOTERS
OpenAustralia
School Resources
Factsheets on the role of Government and Parliament
Information for School Students
Information for Educators
2009 ARTICLES
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2008 ARTICLES
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
Election Pocket Book 09
The Electoral Pocketbook 2009 edition
click here
2007 ARTICLES
Dec Nov Aug
PARTY QUOTE PAGES
EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH
Nationals
Family First
Greens
CDP
-
SAME SEX POLICY - GENERAL
Lib/Nats
Nationals
Family First
CDP
-
SAME SEX MARRIAGE
Lib/Nats
Nationals
-


ABORTION
Lib/Nats
Nationals
Greens
-
EUTHENASIA
Lib/Nats
Nationals
HUMAN CLONING
Labor
Lib/Nats
Nationals
Family First
Greens
CDP
-
IVF & SURROGACY
Lib/Nats
Nationals
Family First
Greens
CDP
-
SAME SEX ADOPTION
Lib/Nats
Nationals
Family First
CDP
-
INDIGENOUS ISSUES
Lib/Nats
Nationals
Family First
Greens
CDP
-
Election Focus Banner

aclFamilyVoice: asking the hard questions before the SA election

March 2010

 

"This year we have again sent surveys to all contactable candidates in the SA state election 2010," said FamilyVoice SA state officer David d’Lima.  "Our ten questions on family, faith and freedom issues were straightforward and specific – but the two major parties found some of them too hard, and the Greens do not want voters to know anything about their policies in these areas.

"Nominations closed just two weeks before the election, so it has been a massive task to identify and contact all 327 candidates.  We have now begun entering their answers on our website  – assessed via scores as follows: 10 (= yes definitely); 7 (= probably); 5 (= unsure); 3 (= unlikely); 2 (= definitely not); 1 (= no comment).  A score of zero indicates a refusal to acknowledge the survey in any way," David d’Lima said. 

"The highest total score is 100, indicating full agreement with all ten questions – such as: ‘Would you support a bill for poker machines to be phased out of hotels and clubs by 2015?’ or ‘Would you vote for enforceable bans on prostitution-related advertising and recruitment to the prostitution trade?’

"Robert Brokenshire and his Family First party said Yes definitely for all questions," David d’Lima said.

"However SA Labor headquarters found the questions too hard.  They told us to find the answers ourselves by checking out the party platform on their website.  We did our best – and Labor scored 40 out of a possible 100.

"SA Liberal headquarters personally replied to our survey, but either don’t have a policy or don’t want to have a policy on most of the questions we asked.  We therefore scored them 5 for most questions.  The Liberal total was 52. 

"However Liberal and Labor candidates are beginning to send personal replies.  Some are scoring better than their party response on conscience issues such as poker machines, prostitution, abortion and euthanasia.  Our survey can help voters who want more information on these issues, which are often not canvassed in the mainstream media," David d’Lima said. 

For more survey details, see http://www.fava.org.au/election-surveys/south-australiaexternal link

FamilyVoice Australia (previously known as Festival of Light Australia) began in 1972 and has grown to become a national organisation with members in all states.

FamilyVoice Australia publishes carefully researched information on current issues affecting the family and the community. 

National Office:

Family Voice Australia
4th Floor, 68 Grenfell Street
South Australia

Ph: 1300 365 965
Fax: (08) 8223 5850

Email: office@fava.org.au

Website: www.fava.org.au


 

 

 

 

disclaimer
Link-Zone does not necessarily endorse the views held by contributors, or by authors of linked websites. The material in the Link-Zone site is provided for your information to assist you in forming your own opinion. It is Link-Zone's hope that you are able to find quality resources that will help you in your research of contemporary debates and issues. We are also unable to endorse the content of external sites linked to via Link-Zone pages & advise that you exercise proper caution when visiting websites you are unfamiliar with.

Copyright: Link-Zone, 2012