The Web Link-Zone
Welcome to the Link-Zone website Image Courtesy of Renjith Krishnan
2010 ARTICLES
-
Feb
Mar
LINKS
Australian Christian Lobby
Saltshakers
Family Voice Australia
Australian Prayer Network
Parliamentary Prayer Network, Canberra
Australian Family Association
Sexual Integrity Forum
Make A Stand
The Australian Family Asssociation
Electing Pro-Life Mps in Victoria Election 2010
Protecting religious freedom in Victoria
Debate Magazine
Viewpoint Magazine
Australia Votes
QLD Parliament LIVE
QLD Parliament Sitting Dates
QLD E-Petitions
WEBSITES FOR VOTERS
OpenAustralia
School Resources
Factsheets on the role of Government and Parliament
Information for School Students
Information for Educators
2009 ARTICLES
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2008 ARTICLES
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
Election Pocket Book 09
The Electoral Pocketbook 2009 edition
click here
2007 ARTICLES
Dec Nov Aug
PARTY QUOTE PAGES
EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH
Nationals
Family First
Greens
CDP
-
SAME SEX POLICY - GENERAL
Lib/Nats
Nationals
Family First
CDP
-
SAME SEX MARRIAGE
Lib/Nats
Nationals
-


ABORTION
Lib/Nats
Nationals
Greens
-
EUTHENASIA
Lib/Nats
Nationals
HUMAN CLONING
Labor
Lib/Nats
Nationals
Family First
Greens
CDP
-
IVF & SURROGACY
Lib/Nats
Nationals
Family First
Greens
CDP
-
SAME SEX ADOPTION
Lib/Nats
Nationals
Family First
CDP
-
INDIGENOUS ISSUES
Lib/Nats
Nationals
Family First
Greens
CDP
-
Election Focus Banner

Family Voice AustraliaPart 1: AHRC - Freedom of Religion and Belief

Printed in Salt Shakers Journal – November 2008.

Freedom of religion is under threat again in Australia!

Ten years ago, in 1998, the federal Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC) ran an Inquiry into religious freedom and published a report called Article 18: Freedom of religion and belief. It investigated Australia’s ‘obligations’ under the UN’s International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

HREOC’s report proposed the establishment of a ‘Religious Freedom Act’ and suggested that all religious beliefs were equal. The Report went to the Parliament - thankfully the Howard government opposed the idea and no new law eventuated. But HREOC, now called the Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) has launched a new Project to evaluate the implementation of the Article 18 Report, the impact of Section 116 of the Constitution and consider the “Roles, rights and responsibilities of religious organisations” and more! Discussion Paper/Submissions

On 17 September AHRC launched a Discussion Paper for their new Inquiry called ‘Freedom of religion and belief in the 21st century’. Prior to that they had already held consultations with various religious leaders around Australia.

Now they are asking for submissions from the PUBLIC - yes, that means YOU!

Submissions close on 31 January 2009. Please read the Discussion Paper.

Next month we’ll give a detailed analysis and some suggestions for your submission.

A special section of the AHRC website has been set up for this Inquiry - it has the Discussion Paper and more reports.

See www.hreoc.gov.au/frb/index.html

The Inquiry

The Inquiry is being run in “partnership” with Monash University, RMIT and the Australian Multicultural Foundation (AMF). What that really means is that the key people are Gary Bouma from Monash (who acted as an expert witness for the Islamic Council in the Catch the Fire vilification case), Des Cahill (RMIT) and Hass Dellal (a Muslim who runs the AMF).

These men also wrote the book called Religion, Cultural Diversity and Safeguarding Australia for an Immigration Department project in 2004. It proposed a rotating roster of prayers in federal Parliament, a national interfaith ‘sacred space’ and a Multifaith Council made up of representatives of all religions. That project also included a book to encourage local Councils to establish Interfaith
Networks, and a sanitised guide to Islam. AHRC notes that the current Inquiry builds on these documents as well as ‘Article 18’.

Race and religion

In 2003, HREOC did a report called ISMA, which interviewed Muslims. They asked to be covered by the federal racial vilification law - because Jewish people are considered a ‘race’. But Islam is not a race, it is a religion. This new Inquiry highlights issues relating to Islam post 9/11 and promotes interfaith and multi-faith issues.

Although state governments have implemented religious discrimination and in some cases religious vilification laws (Vic, ACT, Qld, Tas), the federal government has never enacted any religious discrimination or vilification laws.

This Inquiry presents a major threat to our religious freedom - we must respond!

Part 2: AHRC - Freedom of [from?] Religion



Printed in Salt Shakers Journal, December 2008.

Last month we told you about the disturbing Inquiry being conducted by the Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC), called Freedom of Religion and Belief in the 21st century. They’ve published a Discussion Paper that outlines the aims of the Inquiry.

Submissions have been called for - YES, that means we ALL have an opportunity to tell them what WE think!


Discussion paper overview

The 16 page Discussion paper provides the background and context to the Freedom of Religion and Belief in the 21st Century project, outlines the objectives and focus (including questions), and details the consultation process.

Major Objective

The major objective is to produce a report which will give “recommendations for promoting freedom of religion and belief (including secular belief) in Australia”.

The project will examine the emergence of a multi-faith Australia; the shift away from mainstream Christianity; the growing interface between science and faith; and the privatisation of government services.

Seven Areas

The Discussion Paper lists seven areas for consideration - each of these includes a number of questions. Please obtain the Discussion Paper to read the questions as we can’t print them all here!

Here are just a few of the questions - to illustrate the broad scope of this Inquiry:

* How are federal and state and territory governments managing incitement to religious hatred, and the question of control and responsibility?

* Would a legislated national Charter of Rights add to these freedoms of religion and belief?

* Is there religious radicalism and political extremism in Australia? If so, what are the risks to Australia?

* How is diverse sexuality perceived within faith communities?

* Do you consider environmental concern to be an influence shaping spiritualities and value systems?

* Are there religious groups, practices and beliefs that you think are of concern to Australians?

Can you see from these questions the direction the AHRC wants to go?

What does ‘sexuality’ or politics have to do with religious freedom? What has the ‘environment’ got to do with religious freedom?

Who do they think the ‘religious radicals’ are in Australia? Are they talking about ‘fundamentalist’ Christians being involved in politics?

Is the real purpose to tell religions what their beliefs should be? Is their purpose to create a level playing field?

ACTION:

PLEASE write a submission! We need to tell the Australian Human Rights Commission our views - otherwise they’ll just hear from everyone else!

Submissions DUE by 31 January 2009.

VISIT our campaign page - it has information for your submission - and live links to the Discussion Paper and website. Click here for the Inquiry website.

SEND your submission by email to: frb@humanrights.gov.au

Alternatively post it to

Freedom of Religion and Belief in the 21st Century Submission, Race
Discrimination Unit: Education and Partnerships Section,
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission,
GPO Box 5218,
Sydney NSW 2001.

disclaimer
Link-Zone does not necessarily endorse the views held by contributors, or by authors of linked websites. The material in the Link-Zone site is provided for your information to assist you in forming your own opinion. It is Link-Zone's hope that you are able to find quality resources that will help you in your research of contemporary debates and issues. We are also unable to endorse the content of external sites linked to via Link-Zone pages & advise that you exercise proper caution when visiting websites you are unfamiliar with.

Copyright: Link-Zone, 2012