Election Focus
It's Never TOO Early to be ready for the Next Election
|
|
SEPTEMBER 2008 Articles, Thoughts & Resources |
PM Kevin Rudd ready to borrow cash
29/09 Daily Telegraph | THE Federal Government is prepared to become a borrower for the first time in more than a decade to fund its ambitious infrastructure building program. Kevin Rudd is considering becoming the first Prime Minister in more than 12 years to take on net debt, The Daily Telegraph has learned.
Mr Rudd wants to fund massive improvements to city and regional transport systems, and he wants the "nation building" projects running as quickly as practically possible.
The Government has already outlined projects to be paid for from the $20 billion Building Australia fund coming out of consecutive Budget surpluses.  |
Saving Abandoned Children - TOO IMPORTANT TO IGNORE!
29/09 Senator Helen Polly - Media Release | Senator Helen Polley has continued her campaign to implement 'Safe Haven' legislation in Australia with a speech in the Senate chamber today.
“Safe Havens allow mothers who may otherwise recklessly abandon their baby a chance to take them to a designated area and leave them to be looked after and adopted - no questions asked. If Save Havens were present in Australia then children who may otherwise be abandoned and left to die may stand a chance”, said Senator Polley.
The Senator reminded members of the recent cases of babies that had been abandoned in bus stops, driveways, outside hospitals, and on church doorsteps. Senator Polley has written to all State and Federal Attorneys-General to press home her campaign and is expecting a response shortly.
|
Howard says economy 'very strong'
28/09 SMH.com.au) | Former Prime Minister John Howard says the Australian economy's fundamentals remain "very strong" and he hopes the Rudd government does not squander what it has.
... Australia, thanks largely to the policies of his government, was in a healthy position to ride out the economic turmoil in the US, he said. "Fortunately, the fundamentals of the Australian economy are very strong and those fundamentals were largely created by the former government," Howard told reporters before the award ceremony, held at LA's InterContinental Hotel.
"The fact that we have a big surplus and have paid off our debt, that we have low unemployment, we have low inflation, we have a strong banking system, all of those things will work to our favour. "If Australia were now in debt and were running a big budget deficit, the impact of this would be much greater.".
|
John Howard awarded Medal of Freedom
28/09 Peter Mitchell in LA, USA (AAP) | FORMER prime minister John Howard has been awarded the Winston S Churchill Medal of Freedom at a ceremony in Los Angeles.
The American Freedom Alliance, an LA-based think tank, presented Mr Howard with the award for being "a strong ally of the United States".
Asked if he was concerned Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and the Labor Government would erode the economic fundamentals built up during his 11 years in Australia's top job, Mr Howard replied: "I hope the new government does not in any way squander the inheritance we gave them". |

PRAYER POINT: New South Wales Parliament
Parliamentary Prayer Network, Canberra | This parliament needs our prayers this week. Please lift the following to the Lord and pray as the Spirit leads:
- The new premier, Mr Nathan Rees
- Wisdom for the management of finance
- Exposure of corruption and for peace, Godly government and order to be put in place
- At least 5 by-elections on October 18
- Blessing on Mr Iemma and others as they leave parliament
- Pastors Robert & Norah Adams, NSW PPN Co-ordinators
|
Israel: Petition to Washington
26/09 Ron Ross in Jerusalem | ... Former Israel ambassador to the United Nations Dore Gold carried a petition to Washington. It called for Ahmadinejad to be brought before the international court on charges of genocidal incitement.
One of the first to sign the petition was Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd.
|
Joyce declines Turnbull cabinet spot
19/09 The Australian | NATIONALS senator Barnaby Joyce says he will not accept a position on Malcolm Turnbull's new opposition front bench.
Senator Joyce, the maverick elected leader of the Nationals in the upper house this week, says he is unable to provide Mr Turnbull with a commitment to hold the Coalition line on all issues.
“At times there will be issues that there will, possibly, be a difference on, so on this occasion I humbly decline,” Senator Joyce told reporters in Canberra today. 
Read Also: 'Thanks, but no thanks', Joyce tells Turnbull, The Brisbane Times | The Queenslander, who was this week made the Nationals leader in the Senate, has crossed the floor 21 times since he took his upper house seat in mid-2005.
Today he hinted it could happen again as he respectfully declined an offer from new Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull for a role in the shadow ministry. There's been suggestions the offer was made so Senator Joyce would be committed to accepting coalition positions. Senator Joyce said that wasn't a commitment he could make.
"You'd have to give Malcolm the respect that you would never intend to break from the line," he told reporters. "I couldn't give Malcolm that commitment because obviously the role of the Senate means that at times there will be issues that there could possibly be a difference on. "So on this occasion I humbly decline."
|
Australia's new Liberal leader urged to honour gay rights pledge
18/09 UK: Pink News.com | An MP who represents a constituency with one of the highest gay populations in Australia has been elected as leader of the Liberal party.
Malcolm Turnbull was environment minister in the John Howard administration, which lost power to the Labour party in November. Mr Howard became only the second Prime Minister in Australian history to lose his own Parliamentary seat. Mr Turnbull, 53, successfully defended the Sydney constituency of Wentworth, which after boundary changes now includes gay districts such as Darlinghurst and Kings Cross.
... The Australian Coalition for Equality welcomed his election and called on him to fulfill a promise made before the election, when he wrote to his constituents: "I have sought to address and overcome this [same-sex] discrimination. I pledge to continue this fight until justice is done."
... "Mr Turnbull holds a seat with one of the highest gay and lesbian populations in Australia, and has a reputation for supporting gay and AIDS issues. "We congratulate him on his appointment to the Liberal leadership and call on him to get on with the job of dragging his party into the 21st century." |
Malcolm Turnbull, Leader of the Opposition - Liberal Leadership
16/09 Liberal E News |
Well, it’s a great honour and privilege, humbling, to be elected today to lead the Federal Parliamentary Liberal Party of Australia. Ours is a great party, a party whose values are as important to the prosperity and security of Australia in the years to come as they have been in years gone by because they are values that are based on freedom of choice, on respect for the individual, on fairness, on ensuring that Australia remains a land of opportunity.
I do not come to the position of leader of the Liberal Party from a lifetime of privilege. I know what it is like to be very short of money. I know what it is like to live in rented flats. I know what it is like to grow up with a single parent, with no support other than a devoted and loyal father. I know Australians are doing it tough and some Australians, even in the years of greatest prosperity, will always do it tough. We know that this is a tough world. And our job as Liberals is to ensure that our society is a fair one; a society of opportunity; a society where people can, like my father and I, be able to take advantage of those opportunities, to seize those opportunities and with enterprise and energy, and good luck and hard work, do well.
We are a party of opportunity and this, my friends, is a land of opportunity. Australians and Australia can do anything. We can do anything, but we need to have confidence, we need to have leadership. We need, above all, to have the opportunities to do well. And that is the great difference between our side of politics and Labor, because we believe that government’s role is to enable each and every Australian to do their best, to exercise their freedom of choice to do their best. Labor believes government knows best. We are not so vain as Mr Rudd. We know our job is to empower and enable the enterprise, the dreams, the ambitions of Australians- of all Australians. And that is what I commit myself to doing today as the leader of the Liberal Party, as the leader of the Opposition.  |
WA: New Liberal Government in WA
15/09 Liberal E News |
The Liberal Party will govern with the support of the Nationals in Western Australia, following their defeat of Labor in last week's State Election.
Under the leadership of new Premier Colin Barnett, the Liberal Party is committed to making local communities safer, fixing WA's health system and ensuring West Australian children receive the very best education.
Federal Leader of the Opposition Brendan Nelson said:
"This is an outstanding result for the people of Western Australia and its good governance. "Together with the Nationals, Colin Barnett will take Western Australia in a stronger, more confident direction, finally free of the cynical and under-performing Labor Government." |
NSW: Get your act together Rees - Rudd
15/09 Julian Draper, News.com.au | PRIME Minister Kevin Rudd has told the embattled NSW Government to get its act together and end the infighting that has damaged it electorally.
NSW Labor copped a battering in council elections on the weekend and new premier Nathan Rees says the people have sent his government a strong message. The next state election is not due until March 2011.
Mr Rudd says NSW voters have told the state government "loud and clear that they have a very short time indeed to get their act together".
"That's my view as well," Mr Rudd said today.
"The people of NSW are just fed up with any government which seems to be more concerned about itself than it is about the future of the state.
"And that goes for any political party, whether it's the federal Liberal party or the state branch of the Labor party in NSW."
Both were being damaged by infighting, Mr Rudd said. |
VICTORIA: Crunch time in abortion vote in Victorian Parliament
12/09 Staff writers, Herald Sun |
Strategists on both sides of politics were predicting a narrow pro-reform victory among the 40 MPs in the Upper House voting. But it was unclear if pressure might compel some MPs to block the Bill.
MPs crucial to the ballot include ministers Theo Theophanous, John Lenders and Justin Madden.
  "But there could be wild cards," one minister said.
The Bill has sparked bitter recriminations in Labor ranks over Attorney-General Rob Hulls' decision to oppose change and the active role former minister Christine Campbell has played in opposing it.
One senior Labor figure said of Mr Hulls's decision to oppose reform: "It's unbelievable." Mr Hulls is yet to address the Parliament and detail his reasons |
 
VICTORIA: Crunch time in abortion vote in Victorian Parliament
12/09 Staff writers, Herald Sun | FURIOUS lobbying of swinging Upper House MPs is under way as the major parties, church groups, right-to-life and pro-choice organisations try to capture the crucial final votes in the abortion reform debate.
Both sides' number-crunchers expect the vote to go down to the wire, but there was doubt last night whether the Bill would be passed in the Legislative Council without amendment.
The Legislative Assembly was last night set to approve the abortion package after marathon debate over scores of amendments by pro-life MPs. None was accepted by the Parliament.
Strategists on both sides of politics were predicting a narrow pro-reform victory among the 40 MPs in the Upper House voting. But it was unclear if pressure might compel some MPs to block the Bill.
MPs crucial to the ballot include ministers Theo Theophanous, John Lenders and Justin Madden. . |

VICTORIA: ALL proposed AMENDMENTS were DEFEATED!
The Abortion Law Reform Bill has passed Victoria’s Legislative Assembly by a final vote of 49 to 32 late last night (Thursday 11 September). There are 88 MPs – the Speaker doesn’t vote, leaving 87. Six MPs did not have a vote recorded on this Bill.
Debate on the Bill had resumed on Tuesday 9, with a ‘Second Reading’ vote (in principle support) of 47 votes in favour to 35 against.
Numerous amendments were proposed following that vote – these amendments, put by pro-life MPs and others concerned about some aspects of the Bill, covered a range of aspects, including proposals to reduce the ‘abortion for any reason’ time from 24 weeks down to 20 weeks, offering independent counselling, partial birth abortions, parental permission for under-17s, etc.
ALL of the amendments were defeated.
The debate continued on Wednesday and Thursday, until early in the morning.
Third reading vote: 49 to 32
For FULL VOTE list (word doc) 
Total – 81 votes of 88 Members
[Speaker doesn't vote, 6 Members had no vote recorded - Graley, Judith – Labor; Howard, Geoff – Labor; Jasper, Ken – National; Languiller, Telmo – Labor; Marshall, Kirstie – Labor; Sykes, Bill – National] |
VICTORIA: MP speaks of loss of 22-1/2-week baby
12/09 Paul Austin and David Rood, The Age | VICTORIAN Liberal frontbencher Martin Dixon has a very personal reason for being vehemently opposed to late-term abortions: his daughter, Monique, was born after just 22½ weeks' gestation.
Delivered at the Royal Women's Hospital in 1986, she was "really doing quite well" during her first day of life, Mr Dixon told State Parliament during an emotional late-night sitting on abortion law reform. But Monique quickly deteriorated and only lived one more day. "In the two days of Monique's life she was a person," Mr Dixon, the Opposition's education spokesman and member for Nepean, told a hushed Legislative Assembly. "She was a daughter, she was a sister, she was a granddaughter and she was a niece. She reacted to us, she reacted to light, she reacted to touch, she held my finger and she was a person.
"Because of that experience, I cannot understand how a baby of 22½ weeks can be treated as a foetus."
One year earlier, in 1985, Mr Dixon and his wife, Chris, lost another daughter, this time at 16 weeks, in "quite horrific circumstances". "Even at 16 weeks our daughter made her presence felt in my wife's womb and had, we felt, a personality of her own," he said.
Mr Dixon, who has two healthy children now in their 20s, was on the losing side in Wednesday night's 47 to 35 conscience vote in favour of decriminalising abortion.
|
NSW: Brown lied to Premier over underpants dance
12/09 Imre Salusinszky and Brad Norington, The Australian | NSW Premier Nathan Rees says disgraced former police minister Matt Brown lied to him on three occasions before confessing to dancing in nothing but his underpants at a drunken party in Parliament House on budget night in June.
As crisis continued to engulf the NSW Government, Mr Rees yesterday appointed Lands Minister Tony Kelly to the police portfolio after sacking Mr Brown late on Wednesday. The swift despatching of Mr Brown, just five days after Mr Rees assumed the premiership and promised a fresh start from a new ministry, came as The Australian revealed the short-lived police minister had danced semi-naked on a couch and simulated a sex act on a female Labor MP.
|
ABORTION LAW REFORM BILL
Second Reading
SPEAKER; CAMPBELL
11 September 2008 ASSEMBLY
Page 3536
Debate resumed from 10 September; further discussion of clause 4.
The DEPUTY SPEAKER -- Order! I understand it is the will of the house to defer consideration of the member for Pascoe Vale's amendment 5 until after consideration of amendments 6 and 7. Is leave granted to proceed in this way.
Leave granted.
Ms CHRISTINE CAMPBELL (Pascoe Vale) -- I move:
6. Clause 4, after line 7 insert --
--(a) the woman has been offered counselling by an independent professionally accredited counsellor; and--.
I stress that any suggestions made by the Minister for Women's Affairs or any other person outside this house or in the media that I have ever said that counselling should be compulsory is a total untruth and so far from good counselling and welfare practice that it is laughable. I have always said that women need to be offered counselling by independent professional counsellors.
Why do I ask for such counselling? The first reason is that the decision to end a pregnancy involves two lives. A woman has to be capable of knowing and understanding, and having time to consider and reflect on the implications of that choice. Should she not have the opportunity to do so, the effect of the abortion on her is even more profound than on those who have had the opportunity of attending counselling.
Pregnancy support has two components: the first relates to counselling to assist decision making, and the second is ongoing advice for material, emotional and other support during pregnancy. The aim of decision-making counselling is distinct from that of pre-procedure counselling. Decision-making counselling gives the person the opportunity to consider in more detail the course of action that they propose, whereas pre-procedure counselling takes the person through what they can expect during and after a procedure.
Exactly what is decision-making counselling, and what is the value of having it independently and professionally accredited? The value of it is that it provides the woman with emotional support, time and space so that she can make a decision that is reflective rather than panicked.
In my original contribution to the second-reading debate on this bill I asked people to think about the basis of the decisions they made when they were in a state of extreme stress, worry or anxiety -- when they felt cornered. Many women who are looking at having an abortion see it as their sole option; decision-making counselling enables them to look at options that they may not have even considered. Decision-making counselling allows the woman to talk through the problems facing her. How often have we all found that when we have the opportunity to talk with a friend and articulate what is in our intellect and our heart suddenly things become crystal clear? The advantage of an independent counsellor is that that person has no vested interest in the decision going one way or the other -- all they are interested in is listening, giving the person the time and opportunity to consider their decision and helping them in their decision making merely by letting them articulate their thoughts. Decision-making counselling also assists the client in clarifying her own sense of self.
Most of all, it enables a client to make a reasoned, rational decision, rather than a panicked or ill-informed decision.
Decision-making counselling should never direct the client in any particular way. The best outcome is that the client has the chance to make a good choice because her sense of panic and stress is eased and she can move forward confident in the decision she makes. Decision-making counselling is an engagement between a client and a counsellor; it is not a matter of getting a direction.
I moved this amendment separately and with pleasure because many members wanted to vote on this -- --
The DEPUTY SPEAKER -- Order! The member's time has expired.
Dr DENIS NAPTHINE (South-West Coast) -- I rise to support the amendment. I acknowledge and appreciate the contribution of the member for Pascoe Vale, who moved this amendment, and the decision she made to excise this provision from other amendments she had originally proposed.
In my contribution to the second-reading debate I raised concerns with respect to the need for counselling to be offered to women, their partners, their families and their support network prior to making what is a significant decision with regard to the termination of pregnancy.
All of us would agree that the decision a woman makes with regard to termination of pregnancy is a very significant one that has a major impact on the woman and those close to her not only in the short term but also in the medium and long term. We have heard time and again from women voicing the ongoing concerns, grief and issues that some of them experience with regard to decisions they previously made. Therefore I think it is absolutely essential that women who are making this decision be given every opportunity to make it a sound and considered one. If the woman's decision is made with support and the offer of independent counselling rather than with limited information and under stress -- and this is certainly a stressful time -- it is more likely to be a sound and considered decision that will result in the woman and the people close to her being satisfied that it was the appropriate decision in all the circumstances and being better able to live with it in the medium and longer term.
... I support the amendment. I make it clear that it uses the words, 'the woman has been offered counselling'. It does not say counselling is compulsory, but that the woman has been offered counselling by an independent, professionally accredited counsellor. In all circumstances a woman's decision to have a termination is a very significant decision, usually taken at a time which is very stressful for her and those around her.
In those circumstances, if we can provide an offer of counselling that may assist in good decision making, then we are....
The DEPUTY SPEAKER -- Order! The member's time has expired.
Mrs CHRISTINE FYFFE (Evelyn) -- I rise to support the amendment regarding the provision of counselling. At a time when people are considering abortion, for whatever reason, the feedback I am getting is that it is often a time when they feel very alone. Often the decision is made in isolation from the family because of various circumstances. I have also been approached by men who have been involved who, while accepting that the decision is being made by the woman, would also like someone to talk to. The offer of independent counselling, separate from the doctor who is performing the termination, is very important and is a reassurance to those who may have doubts, even if they believe what they are doing is right.
It is a reassurance in later time; when they think about it they will know they have explored the avenues and talked it through. I say again that several people have told me it is a very lonely time and that they would have liked the opportunity to talk to someone independent and understanding who would not try to persuade them one way or another but would help them crystallise their thoughts, because that is what counselling does.
Mr WAKELING (Ferntree Gully) -- I rise to support the amendment put before the house by the member for Pascoe Vale. It is very important that we understand that this amendment is seeking to introduce counselling which, as has been described by those previously, is voluntary. It is about availability of counselling. It is not about forcing women to go through a process which they may choose not to participate in. It is about having the opportunity available for women to take it at a time in their lives which is obviously very stressful.
As I indicated in my speech in the second-reading debate on this bill, I have concerns about the lack of involvement of counselling services. This community provides citizens with counselling opportunities on a range of issues. Those who are having problems with relationships are provided with relationship counselling. Those who are suffering stress or strain in their lives through grief are provided counselling. Counselling is provided for a whole range of reasons, and rightly so, because parliaments across this country have seen fit to ensure that those services are made available to people who are going through a difficult situation in their lives to try to assist them. We even provide it for financial assistance.
When dealing with a very serious issue, the potential abortion procedure, it behoves us as members of this house to provide women with the opportunity to participate in counselling.
If we were debating whether we as politicians were going to remove the right of women in the state of Victoria to have access to counselling services before an abortion procedure, there would be outrage from many in this community, and rightly so. All we are seeking to do is to provide that opportunity for women. I congratulate the member for Pascoe Vale on her amendment, and I will be supporting the proposal.
......
Mr Hugh DELAHUNTY (Lowan) -- This matter is very critical for this process and the bill being debated today. I strongly support the amendment moved by the member for Pascoe Vale, that women be offered a counselling service by an independent professionally accredited counsellor. I will tell members my story.
About 30 years ago my then partner -- now my lovely wife -- and I conceived a child. It was a most traumatic time back then. We needed all the counselling we could get because it was a very emotional time. We were young, we did not have a lot of life experience, and we needed counselling. We went through the agony of talking about adoption, and we touched on the possibility of abortion among many other options.
Thankfully we kept our child, but that was a very difficult experience in our lives.
I think a young person -- it does not matter what age they are -- needs support during that decision-making process. It is important that we as legislators, not the Victorian Law Reform Commission, come up with what we know is right not only for the mother and not only for the partner, but what is right for the unborn child. We must offer counselling.
We have legislation in this place which relates to IVF (in-vitro fertilisation); it makes it compulsory that the people involved have counselling before they have a child. With this legislation we are going to destroy an unborn child, yet we are not even offering counselling to those involved. Members must support this amendment.
I understand that the availability of counselling services is a problem in country areas. I hear the word 'choice' all the time but this is not only a choice for the mother, who no doubt will have a major say in this, but also the interests of the partner, and particularly of the unborn child who cannot speak, must be taken into account. We must support this amendment.
NOTE: Link-Zone has added the first names of MLAs only & key supporters of this amendment - for full transcript go to Hansard page |
Emotional Debate on Victoria, Australia Abortion Bill
09/09 Hilary White, Lifesite News | Today's debate in the Victoria Parliament over proposals to loosen abortion restrictions in the state was an emotional debate, with one pro-abortion MP breaking down into tears at one point.
Pro-abortion state cabinet minister Jacinta Allan broke down while she told parliament of "extreme" and "abusive" phone calls she had received from some constituents opposed to abortion.
Sports Minister James Merlino, who is opposed to the bill, expressed his concern that Victoria was attracting abortion-seekers from around the country under the current laws. "There's nothing in this bill to stop that," he said. "We are already seeing people, from WA for example, coming to Victoria, and I think that will increase."
He rejected the claim of Premier Brumby that removing abortion from the Crimes Act would result in no increase in the rate of abortion. Merlino said, "There's no doubt this isn't going to lead to a levelling of the number of abortions in this state - it could well lead to an increase."
Premier Brumby told media this week that he looks at the bill as a way of bringing the law into line with the "current practice." Under Supreme Court decisions, as many as 20,000 abortions are already committed legally in Victoria each year.
He said today that he expected the bill to pass both houses, telling Parliament decriminalisation was long overdue.
Pro-life MP Marlene Kairouz spoke of a child she knew who had been born 3½ months premature at Sunshine Hospital, weighing only 875 grams. Now six years old, Kairouz said that the child had started school this year at St Albans East Primary.
The proposed law would allow abortions without restrictions up to 24 weeks gestation, well after the point at which physicians can save premature babies. After 24 weeks, the child can be killed if two doctors sign their consent for "medical reasons."
Kairouz told the House that a child's heart begins to beat at 24 days gestation and at 20 weeks a foetus shows signs of sensitivity to pain and responds to light, touch, sound and taste.
"I don't believe human beings deliberately choose to undertake cruelty, but I do believe abortion is a denial of all our humanity and dignity," Ms Kairouz said. "The unborn child is the most vulnerable human being, and as legislators it is our responsibility to protect all human beings."
Nationals leader Peter Ryan said, "This bill seeks to legalise the killing of innocents. I am opposed to it and I will vote against it."
Sports Minister James Merlino and MP Christine Campbell have introduced a series of amendments that seek to reduce the time for access to abortion from 24 to 20 weeks, mandate independent counselling and allow late-term abortions only with the authorisation of a specialist review panel.
"The current legislation is a gift to the abortion industry," Campbell said
One Labour MP, Kirstie Marshall said that although she supported taking abortion out of the criminal code, she would vote against the bill.
She told the House she could not support the 24-week time limit, citing her personal experience that 19 weeks into the pregnancy of her daughter "she had a gender, a name and was trying to make me as uncomfortable as possible, just to let me know that she needed some space."
Source: LifeSite News - http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/sep/08090909.html  |
|
ACT: MLAs urged to declare abortion views
September 9, 2008 | ABC News | The ACT Government has put abortion back on the political agenda, two months out from the election. The ACT was the first jurisdiction to decriminalise abortion in 2002.
Government backbencher Mick Gentleman has foreshadowed a motion in the Legislative Assembly which will force Opposition MLAs to declare their views. Chief Minister Jon Stanhope says voters deserve to know where Opposition Leader Zed Seselja stands on the issue."We haven't had an opportunity to learn or understand what his personal values or philosophies are on issues that are very important to the community," he said. |
NSW: I wasn't drunk, says sacked minister
08/09 Imre Salusinszky and Brad Norington, The Australian | DUMPED NSW police minister Matt Brown has denied he was drunk at the wild Parliament House party where he allegedly stripped to his underwear.
Mr Brown told The Sun-Herald newspaper that the night of the party in his eighth-floor office on June 3 was marked by stupidity but not drunkenness.
He said he remembered taking off his shirt, and dancing, but did not remember taking off his pants. "I don't recall parading around in my underwear," he said. "I know I took my shirt off and I know I did have a dance. I was working off steam in the privacy of my own office with workmates. It was harmless fun." 
|
NSW: Frank Sartor takes parting shot at boss Nathan Rees
08/09 Joe Hildebrand, The Daily Telegraph | DUMPED senior minister Frank Sartor has dropped a bucket on new Premier Nathan Rees, saying his Government was still captive to factional interests. Less than two hours after being routed from Cabinet by his own faction, a clearly emotional Mr Sartor said the Government would be the poorer for not having him...." 
|
VICTORIA: Tomorrow the debate in the Victorian Parliament begins.
08/09 Bill Muehlenberg | Please contact your local Victorian MPs if you have not already done so, and please, please pray for the outcome of this debate. This is a watershed issue and we must all make a stand, or – dare I say it? - stand condemned by our silence |
Freedom to be Born March
07/09 Bill Muehlenberg | ... the 2000 or so people who took part in the Freedom to be Born march on Saturday was certainly the biggest pro-life march for ages. Many young people and doctors were there, and the 100 pro-death protestors who sought to disrupt the march were pitiful by comparison. (Many thanks to Peter Stokes of Saltshakers for the photo) ... more articles on this topic in our Action Australia pages  |
VICTORIA: Abortion has a new adversary in Costello
06/09 Angela Shanahan, The Australian | RARELY does any federal politician, let alone one who has been touted as a small-l liberal, denounce a liberal abortion bill being pushed in a state parliament, particularly one in his own state and backed by elements of both parties.
Despite his obviously conventional family background with its conservative credentials, Peter Costello has often been called a liberal on social issues. But Costello's reaction is outrage when I ask him this week about the government proposals before the Victorian parliament to legalise abortion formally and for up to 24 weeks into pregnancy or, as some Greens favour, up to the full term.
"I can't believe that there is a proposal to make abortion legal as a matter of course up to 24 weeks, when babies are born at less than 24 weeks. We will have a situation in this country when in one part of a hospital babies will be in humidicribs being kept alive and in some other part it will be legal to be aborting them," the Liberal Party's former deputy leader and former federal treasurer says.
In this area, the man many would like to see lead the Liberal Party is not so far off the opinion of the heartland of Australia. Although commentators routinely decry the "lack of evidence" on abortion in Australia, we do know some facts from surveys that have been done. One is that Australian attitudes to abortion are not as liberal as many commentators -- or many in the Victorian parliament -- believe. During the past two decades, there has been a shift in attitudes generally on abortion towards the centre, but attitudes on late abortion have become more conservative. |
VICTORIA: A mockery of human rights
06/09 Bishop Christopher Prowse, Melbourne | All of the world's major religions prohibit and condemn the taking of innocent human life. It is a crime no human law can claim to legitimise.
The proposed legislation will provide that all doctors, registered nurses and pharmacists, regardless of any conscientious objections, should co-operate in performing abortions. This makes a mockery of the Victorian Charter of Human Rights. Nurses are in a particularly vulnerable position, since many would be under a duty to assist in an abortion if a doctor requests, and determines, that it is an emergency.
I do not believe that our community wants to force nurses, many of whom have a conscientious objection, to assist in late term abortions. After government, the Catholic Church is one of the biggest providers of health care in Victoria. If this Bill is passed it will be an outrageous attack on our service to the community and contrary to Catholic ethical codes. Catholic hospitals will not perform abortions and will not provide referrals for the purpose of abortion.
Policies ought to be directed towards giving women with unplanned and difficult pregnancies real choices, other than abortion. The community wants to reduce abortions in Victoria, of which there are possibly 20,000 a year. But it is more likely that the proposed Bill will increase this number markedly, because the Bill is more liberal than current clinical practice. It does not include one single policy initiative that would reduce the number of abortions. Incredibly, it treats abortion as simply "another" medical procedure.
Far too many women carry silently the emotional grief and psychological harm of abortion. The Bill before Parliament offers no provision for professional counselling to women with unplanned or difficult pregnancies.
What will be stopping a 15-year-old pregnant girl requesting a pharmacist to sell her medicine that will induce an abortion? (The legislation will not require a doctor's prescription up to 24 weeks of pregnancy. ) How will the pharmacist know that the pregnancy is under 24 weeks? What support can the girl be given medically and psychologically? What about the girl's guardians? The Bill ignores the fact that there are two persons, not just one, affected by every choice about abortion.
People do not have to be religious to embrace my views and concerns. They are based on right reason and good ethics. The proposed Bill takes abortion law reform far beyond current practice. I believe that the community does not want to see the rights of the unborn child so carelessly sidelined. We want government policies that demonstrate sincere care and concern for women with unplanned pregnancies. And we want the rights of health professionals protected, not trampled upon |
 NSW: Iemma resigns as NSW premier, Nathan Rees elected
05/09 Perth Now | NATHAN Rees is the new Labor premier of New South Wales after Morris Iemma resigned in tears earlier today. Mr Iemma was forced to stand down following a challenge by the former Emergency Services Minister, Mr Rees, who has been in parliament for only 18 months.
It was the first time in its 117-year history that Labor had dumped a premier.
Mr Rees was endorsed in the top job, with Carmel Tebbutt as his deputy, at a caucus meeting this afternoon.... After a devastating 12 months Mr Iemma was rolled by MPs angry at his handling of the power privatisation and loyalty to Treasurer Michael Costa.

|
NSW: Michael Costa sacked in reshuffle
05/09 The Australian | CONTROVERSIAL NSW Treasurer Michael Costa has been sacked.
Mr Costa was told late last night by NSW Premier Morris Iemma that he would not be included on the new front bench to be unveiled this afternoon, in a reshuffle brought on by the resignation of Deputy Premier John Watkins, The Australian reports.
It is understood the incoming Treasurer will be John Hatzistergos, currently the state's Attorney-General. Lands Minister Tony Kelly and Gaming Minister Graham West are also understood to be in Mr Iemma's firing line. 
|

NATIONAL: First female governor-general sworn in
05/09 AAP | AUSTRALIA will get its first female governor-general when Quentin Bryce is sworn in today at Parliament House.
The former Queensland governor will become the country's 25th governor-general when she assumes the post vacated earlier this week by Major General Michael Jeffery. She comes to the head of state role after serving as governor of Queensland for five years. . |
Same-sex reform possible without social engineering
Australian Christian Lobby Newsletter | The Australian Christian Lobby supports the basic intent of the Government’s same-sex law reform bill introduced today but is adamant its aims be achieved without redefining parenthood and children.
ACL Chief of Staff Lyle Shelton applauded the Government for continuing to honour its election commitment to protect legal marriage between a man and a woman. However, he said there was no need to create new classes of children based on biological fiction in order to end discrimination.
“There is no need to redefine children in the Acts being amended under this omnibus bill and where there is a need for clarity, a dependency test could be applied to determine what rights a child and its carers in same-sex relationships might have, Mr Shelton said. |
4WDs essential, not luxury, say farmers
05/09 News.com.au | QUEENSLAND farm lobby group Agforce has commended Family First Senator Steve Fielding and the Coalition for opposing the luxury car tax. AgForce chief executive officer Brett de Hayr said robust and costly four-wheel drive vehicles were a necessity, not a luxury, for many people living and working in remote areas who have hundreds of kilometres of dirt road to get to town.
 |
EDERAL: September vote on ending Medicare funding for abortion
Australian Christian Lobby Newsletter | Amidst continuing concern about Australia’s high abortion rates, a motion to disallow the continued Medicare funding of second trimester and late-term abortions is set to be debated and voted on in the Senate on September 17.
The motion was proposed by Tasmanian Senator Guy Barnett in June and ACL is urging Senators to support it.
A briefing paper released by Senator Barnett says that since 1994 the Australian taxpayer has paid abortionists about $1.7 million to perform over 10,000 second trimester and late term abortions. By contrast, a national opinion poll conducted in 2005 by Market Facts (Qld) found that 67 per cent of Australians are opposed to Medicare funding of abortions performed in the second trimester. Please click here to read the in-depth briefing paper.
The laws governing when abortions can take place are a matter for the States and Territories, but the Federal Government has responsibility for the Medicare scheme. If passed, Senator Barnett’s motion would disallow an item in the Health Insurance regulations which provides for Medicare funding of second trimester and late term abortions (from 14-26 weeks of pregnancy). Third trimester abortions (post 26 weeks) are not funded by Medicare.
ACL is in the process of putting together a ‘Make a Stand’ campaign to encourage Federal politicians to support Senator Barnett’s motion. More details will be released next week and we urge you to take part in the campaign and help end a situation which is seeing Medicare funding used to end the lives of babies who are often old enough to survive outside the womb. |

PRAYER POINT: Senator Guy Barnett
Parliamentary Prayer Network, Canberra | Has felt lead of the Lord to introduce a controversial bill attempting to abolish Medicare funding for later term abortions. Pray for God's wisdom upon Senator Barnett such that he knows the road to walk in this regard, and for protection for him and his family at this time. Pray against those who would seek to attack him personally. |
Time to tell MPs unborn are 'alive and kicking'
Australian Christian Lobby Newsletter | Tail-docking a dog would be illegal, putting a lobster in boiling water would be illegal, but it will be legal to abort a six-month-old child if this Bill passes. – Victorian Liberal MLC Matthew Guy
If the Government is going to decriminalise the process, we need to do it with our eyes wide open and demand modern legislation that spells out a standard of care for our women. I am determined to get support from all MPs to pass amendments, whatever the outcome of the conscience vote. – Victorian Labor MP Christine Campbell
With 20,000 abortions performed in Victoria each year, the Victorian Government this week introduced abortion law reforms which provide virtually open slather access to abortion, ignoring calls for protection of women and unborn children.
Set to be debated on September 9, the Abortion Law Reform Bill will, if passed, give unfettered legal access to abortion for any reason up to 24 weeks’ gestation, without even the need for a doctor’s agreement. After that, women will also have easy access to late-term abortions - including brutal partial birth abortions, with no criminal penalties for either the woman or the doctor.
Needless to say, ACL is strongly opposed to the abortion bill which sells out the unborn children of Victoria and does nothing to assist women facing unsupported pregnancies. Pro-abortionists, however, are celebrating.
ACL Victorian Director Rob Ward has been lobbying hard against the bill and speaking to the media. The bill is likely to increase Victoria’s high abortion rate, departs from the Government’s plege not to change current clinical practice, does nothing to support women, and ignores major ethical concerns about the killing of unborn children – some of whom would be old enough to survive outside the womb.
With the abortion bill set to be debated in less than three weeks, it is vital that you make your opposition to the bill known to Victorian politicians. Several commentators are already suggesting the bill will be passed, even though thankfully there are a number of politicians who are strongly opposed to the bill and are making their concerns known. While strongly opposed to the bill, Labor MP Christine Campbell is working on ammendments to provide at least some protection for women and children.
If you live in Victoria, we urge you to go to our ‘Alive & Kicking’ campaign on our Make A Stand website by clicking here and sending off an email to your local Member and Upper House representatives urging them to vote against the bill. But don’t stop there, please also consider ringing your local MP or visiting them in their electorate offices to let them know your concerns. Contact details can be found by clicking here. If you live outside Victoria you can still help. Please also join ! our campaign and your email will be sent to the Victorian Premier.
|
Euthanasia bill delayed to Nov
22/08 Australian Christian Lobby Newsletter | Victoria: debate resumed on the euthanasia bill on Wednesday night with seven of the nine Upper House politicians who spoke indicating they would oppose it – and some speaking out very strongly.
Debate started later than planned and will be continued on Wednesday November 10.
Please encourage politicians to oppose the bill by going to our ‘Care, not killing’ campaign on our Make AStand website by clicking here. |
|
|
|
|