Link-Zone Banner
2008
Scenes from the Passing Madness
Home Truths about AIDs
Environmentalism & Religion
Our topsy turvy World Instalment 359: On Kangaroo Culls and Child Porn
Our Campus Censorship
On Relationship Recognition
Our Family Friendly (NOT) Labor Government
Islam and Christianity: Looking at the Numbers
Let My People Think
Muslim & Christian Relations
Worldviews & Baby Killing
Reflections on the New Government
Now that we've said Sorry
Whales in, Babies Out
Islamisation Versus Christendom
Human Hating Humanitarians
Dark Day for Children
2007
ALL 2007 ARTICLES
Recruiting Kids to Hate God
Two and a Half Cheers for the Former Government
Salt & Light Business
Why do the Nations Rage?
On Capital Punishment - Part 1
On Capital Punishment - Part 2
On Delivering a Hard Word
More Madness, More Messed up Children
When Madness reigns Children Suffer
When PC Endangers Children
Europe and the Importance of Memory
No We Do Not Worship the Same God!
What to Make of Allah
A Victory for Babies & Humanity
Dispelling the Myths of Appeasement
2006
Separation of Church & State
Sexualising Our Children
bmVisit Bill's Culture Watch Website for more
articles, forums, book reviews ..
. Here
ONLINE STORE:
Online Store
 

Culture Watch

Bill Muehlenberg
Bill Muehlenberg

A Victory for Babies (and Humanity)

Last week the US Supreme Court voted by a 5-4 majority to uphold a ban on late-term abortions. On April 18 the Court decided to uphold the 2003 Partial-Birth Abortion Ban. Also known as D & X abortions, this method of abortion is as close as you can get to actual infanticide.

Unfortunately most people do not know what takes place during this grizzly procedure. I have written elsewhere about this barbaric act of baby killing, but my words may not count for much. The words of someone who has been there and done that may carry more weight.

Thus I reprint here part of a testimony given on March 21, 1996 by a registered nurse, Brenda Pratt Shafer. She was speaking before a U.S. House of Representatives hearing on The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act (HR 1833). Her words are so powerful and compelling that they deserve little or no commentary. Here is part of what the nurse said:

I am a registered nurse, licensed in the State of Ohio, with 14 years of experience. In 1993, I was employed by Kimberly Quality Care, a nursing agency in Dayton, Ohio. In September, 1993, Kimberly Quality Care asked me to accept assignment at the Women’s Medical Center, which is operated by Dr. Martin Haskell. I readily accepted the assignment because I was at that time very pro-choice. I had even told my teenage daughters that if one of them ever got pregnant at a young age, I would make them get an abortion. They disagreed with me on this, and one of them even wrote an essay for a high school class that mentioned how we differed on the issue.

So, because of the strong pro-choice views that I held at that time, I thought this assignment would be no problem for me.

But I was wrong. I stood at a doctor’s side as he performed the partial-birth abortion procedure - and what I saw is branded forever on my mind.

I worked as an assistant nurse at Dr. Haskell’s clinic for three days - September 28, 29, and 30, 1993. On the first day, we assisted in some first-trimester abortions, which is all I’d expected to be involved in. (I remember that one of the patients was a 15-year-old-girl who was having her third abortion.)

On the second day, I saw Dr. Haskell do a second-trimester procedure that is called a D & E (dilation and evacuation). He used ultrasound to examine the fetus. Then he used forceps to pull apart the baby inside the uterus, bringing it out piece by piece and piece, throwing the pieces in a pan.

Also on the first two days, we inserted laminaria to dilate the cervixes of women who were being prepared for the partial-birth abortions - those who were past the 20 weeks point, or 4 1/2 months. (Dr. Haskell called this procedure “D & X”, for dilation and extraction.) There were six or seven of these women.

On the third day, Dr. Haskell asked me to observe as he performed several of the procedures that are the subject of this hearing. Although I was in that clinic on assignment of the agency, Dr. Haskell was interested in hiring me full time, and I was being given orientation in the entire range of procedures provided at that facility.

I was present for three of these partial-birth procedures. It is the first one that I will describe to you in detail. The mother was six months pregnant (26 1/2 weeks). A doctor told her that the baby had Down Syndrome and she decided to have an abortion. She came in the first two days to have the laminaria inserted and changed, and she cried the whole time. On the third day she came in to receive the partial-birth procedure.

Dr. Haskell brought the ultrasound in and hooked it up so that he could see the baby. On the ultrasound screen, I could see the heart beating. As Dr. Haskell watched the baby on the ultrasound screen, the baby’s heartbeat was clearly visible on the ultrasound screen.

Dr. Haskell went in with forceps and grabbed the baby’s legs and pulled them down into the birth canal. Then he delivered the baby’s body and the arms - everything but the head. The doctor kept the baby’s head just inside the uterus.

The baby’s little fingers were clasping and unclasping, and his feet were kicking. Then the doctor stuck the scissors through the back of his head, and the baby’s arms jerked out in a flinch, a startle reaction, like a baby does when he thinks that he might fall.

The doctor opened up the scissors, stuck a high-powered suction tube into the opening and sucked the baby’s brains out. Now the baby was completely limp. I was really completely unprepared for what I was seeing. I almost threw up as I watched the doctor do these things.

Mr. Chairman, I read in the paper that President Clinton says that he is going to veto this bill. If President Clinton had been standing where I was standing at that moment, he would not veto this bill.

Dr. Haskell delivered the baby’s head. He cut the umbilical cord and delivered the placenta. He threw that baby in a pan, along with the placenta and the instruments he’d used. I saw the baby move in the pan. I asked another nurse and she said it was just “reflexes.”

I have been a nurse for a long time and I have seen a lot of death - people maimed in auto accidents, gunshot wounds, you name it. I have seen surgical procedures of every sort. But in all my professional years, I had never witnessed anything like this.

The woman wanted to see her baby, so they cleaned up the baby and put it in a blanket and handed the baby to her. She cried the whole time, and she kept saying, “I’m so sorry, please forgive me!” I was crying too. I couldn’t take it. That baby boy had the most perfect angelic face I have ever seen.

I was present in the room during two more such procedures that day, but I was really in shock. I tried to pretend that I was somewhere else, to not think about what was happening. I just couldn’t wait to get out of there. After I left that day, I never went back. These last two procedures, by the way, involved healthy mothers with healthy babies.

I was very much affected by what I had seen. For a long time, sometimes still, I had nightmares about what I saw in that clinic that day. . . . I wish I hadn’t seen it. But I did see it, and I will never be able to forget it. That baby boy was only inches, seconds away from being entirely born, when he was killed. What I saw done to that little boy, and to those other babies, should not be allowed in this country.

*****

The full account by nurse Shafer can be found at numerous places. Here is one: http://www.priestsforlife.org/testimony/brendatestimony.html

But since a picture is worth a thousand words, the only other thing to add to her moving statement is a diagram of the procedure. A number of these exist. A very good set of diagrams can be seen here: http://www.ppl.org/PBA.html

If you have not yet seen these, please do. We must wake up to the horrible reality of late-term abortion.

[1250 words]

 

 

Bill Muehlenberg is an Independent Commentator on Cultural, Social and Religious issues.

Bill describes himself as a "cultural missionary," with a mandate to stand up for God's standards in the secular world.

Bill works freelance, speaking up for Biblical values in society
s an independent consultant / contractor. He is often contracted to various Christian organizations as a researcher or speaker and is well known for his media comment and public speaking.

If you are interested in supporting this Faith-Based Ministry then please contact :
BillMuehlenberg@Link-Zone.net

For Forums and other great resources visit Bill's New Website http://www.BillMuehlenberg.com

Link-Zone does not necessarily endorse the views held by contributors, or by authors of linked websites. This material is provided for your information to assist you in forming your own opinion. It is Link-Zone's hope that you are able to find quality resources that will help you in your research of current issues.

Link-Zone, 2000 - 2008