Link-Zone Banner
2008
Palin & Worldviews
Going Ape over Human Rights
Scenes from the Passing Madness
Home Truths about AIDs
Environmentalism & Religion
Our topsy turvy World Instalment 359: On Kangaroo Culls and Child Porn
Our Campus Censorship
On Relationship Recognition
Our Family Friendly (NOT) Labor Government
Islam and Christianity: Looking at the Numbers
Let My People Think
Muslim & Christian Relations
Worldviews & Baby Killing
Reflections on the New Government
Now that we've said Sorry
Whales in, Babies Out
Islamisation Versus Christendom
Human Hating Humanitarians
Dark Day for Children
2007
ALL 2007 ARTICLES
Recruiting Kids to Hate God
Two and a Half Cheers for the Former Government
Salt & Light Business
Why do the Nations Rage?
On Capital Punishment - Part 1
On Capital Punishment - Part 2
On Delivering a Hard Word
More Madness, More Messed up Children
When Madness reigns Children Suffer
When PC Endangers Children
Europe and the Importance of Memory
No We Do Not Worship the Same God!
What to Make of Allah
A Victory for Babies & Humanity
Dispelling the Myths of Appeasement
2006
Separation of Church & State
Sexualising Our Children
bmVisit Bill's Culture Watch Website for more
articles, forums, book reviews ..
. Here
ONLINE STORE:
Online Store
 

Culture Watch

Bill Muehlenberg
Bill Muehlenberg

Sexualising our Children

12 October 2006

Earlier this week the Australia Institute issued a report claiming that the corporate world is increasingly targetting and sexualising our children. Young girls especially are in the sights of many major retailers. Bras and lingerie for 6-year-olds, for example, are becoming common in our mainstream retail outlets. Fashion and gossip magazines aimed at very young girls are also becoming the norm.

The Institute report, authored by Dr Emma Rush, claimed that in the interests of making big bucks, the coporate world is stealing away our children’s innocence. And the danger of these advertising and marketing campaigns is that children will succumb to eating dosorders, miss out on their childhood, and fall victim to pedophiles. Indeed, the report is titled, “Corporate Paedophilia: Sexualisation of children in Australia”.

Of course such charges have been made elsewhere, especially in the US, for some years now. For example, one important American television documentary on this whole situation was released in 2001, entitled The Merchants of Cool. My summary and analysis of that very helpful film can be found in the sexuality section of this website (“The Betrayal of a Generation”).

But it is good to see an Australian study on this worrying trend. And the report has generated a lot of controversy. Many retailers are up in arms, and the civil libertarians are of course getting all shook up.

One take on this story appears in today’s Australian. Angela Conway writes (“Young ones won't be young for long” – October 12, 2006) that the report is indeed accurate and necessary. She too decries the marketing of padded bras to 8-year-olds: “Little girls like pretty things but do they need bras with padding? And should they learn so early that their bodies are for flaunting? More than just another nail in the coffin of childhood, these underwear trends contribute to the premature sexualising of children with cynical disregard for the consequences. “

She analyses a number of the labels in question, including Target, Barbie, Saddle Club, Disney and Bratz. Indeed, the Bratz line of products is especially troublesome: “The ambiguities of the Bratz products' images are creepily reminiscent of the kinds of fantasies and warped perceptions of women and girls so central to pornography. Defenders of raunch culture say turning pornographic imagery into a weapon of "girl power" liberates girls and women. But just how powerful will little girls be when, with pelvises thrust forward, they have learned the scripted moves and obsessions of the Bratz dolls, underwear, website and DVDs? They will take on a sexualised language they cannot possibly understand. And it will be done at their peril.”

The possible connection with child porn and pedophilia is a major concern: “The Bratz doll range echoes the fantasies and common beliefs of pedophiles researched by Kurt Eichenwald of The New York Times. He found that a core belief running through pedophile conversations on the internet revolved around children's purported sexual autonomy, desire for sexual relations with adults and their rights to freedom of sexual expression.”

She continues, “Eichenwald reported on common preferences among pedophiles for images of children about five years old dressed in diapers or in sexually provocative, revealing clothing and lingerie, similar to many of the Bratz dolls. The animations on the Bratz website show Bratz Babyz being bathed while looking fetchingly grown-up and knowing. The similarities to Eichenwald's description of images of nine-year-old ‘Sparkles’ in the bath posted on pedophile blogs seem striking. Eichenwald shows that much of the pedophile activity on the web has switched to porn sites masquerading as children's modelling sites.”

Concludes Conway, “The links between search terms such as ‘little girls' lingerie’ to pedophilia become apparent with a web search. Revealed are sales pitches such as ‘lingerie for petite little girls; watch our little models showing off sexy lingerie’. In the cold light of proliferating internet pedophile networks and child porn sites, the purveyors of raunch culture for little girls may just seem plain foolish. At the very least, they are stealing childhood for cold commercial gain. At worst, they may be contributing mightily to a grooming process that the pedophiles of this world will thank them for.”

Quite right. Child porn and the sexualisation of our young are ever-increasing problems in our sex-soaked society. We certainly do not need major retailers contributing to the problem, even indirectly. Civil libertarians will undoubtedly beg to differ. Indeed, the editorial in today’s Australian pours cold water on the Australia Institute report, speaking of “moral panic” and sexuality being in the eye of the beholder. Yet most parents know these are legitimate fears, and that our children deserve protection from such greedy marketeers.

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20564738-7583,00.html

[772 words]

Link-Zone does not necessarily endorse the views held by contributors, or by authors of linked websites. This material is provided for your information to assist you in forming your own opinion. It is Link-Zone's hope that you are able to find quality resources that will help you in your research of current issues.

Link-Zone, 2000 - 2008